Rubric for Evaluating PowerPoint Presentations for the Forrest Gump WebQuest
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Content |
Facts missing or incomplete. |
Some facts correct. |
Most facts correct |
All facts correct and complete. |
Research |
Little evidence of research. |
Some evidence of research, at least two attractions to site. |
Shows evidence of research, at least three attractions to site. |
Shows considerable research, with more than three attractions to the
site. |
Persuasiveness |
Group is unprepared, gives weak arguments, and/or is poorly organized. |
Group has unsure knowledge about site, gives weak or questionable
arguments, and lacks adequate planning. |
Group is knowledgeable about site, gives good arguments, and shows
adequate planning of the presentation. |
Group is very knowledgeable about site, gives good arguments, and shows
evidence of organization and planning of the presentation. |
PowerPoint |
Poor or inconsistent design, crowded slides, and/or poorly ordered
slides. |
Ineffective design, no extra features, crowded or sparse slides, and/or
slides poorly organized |
Attractive design, no extra features or improperly used extras, right
amount of information per slide, good organization. |
Attractive design, proper use of extra features to heighten interest,
right amount of information per slide, well organized. |