| Domain 
        of Evaluation
 Evaluation can best be described as the process of determining the effectiveness 
          of learning. Seels and Richey suggest that
 “evaluation procedures determine the adequacy of instruction.” 
          Evaluation is a continuous process that occurs before, during,
 and after instruction. During the design phase, the problem assessed 
          must have a method of being measured. While designing,
 performance objectives or criterion-reference testing methods are put 
        into place to examine the success of obtaining the desired outcome or 
        optimal performance.
 
 Analysis, assessment and evaluation play an important role in the instructional 
          design process and in instructional technology
 itself. General systems theory, which typically guides the overall design 
          process, provides the logic for the evaluation tasks
 encountered by instructional technologies (Seels, 1993). Needs assessments, 
          formative and summative evaluations and
 criterion-referenced testing are prompted by the need to create self-regulated 
          systems. They are also prompted by the belief
 in the positive role of feedback. This domain grew as the educational 
        research field grew. Evaluation domain is classified according to the 
        object being evaluated. Common distinctions are programs, projects and 
        products or materials (UNCW, 2001).
 The four most common forms 
        of evaluating used for evaluating the process and product of instruction 
        include: Needs Assessment, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, 
        and Criterion-referenced Testing. Click the following links to view the 
        descriptions of each method of evaluation. 
 |