Figure Index

 

The Domains of the Field
Figure 1. Domains of the Field
Adopted from Seels and Richey, 1994


Education vs. Instruction
Figure 2. Education vs. Instruction
Adopted from Smith and Ragan, 1999

 

Instructional design and instructional media are two overlapping aspects of instructional technology because while instructional media is defined during design when the delivery system is chosen, it is also important to other domains of instructional technology such as development and utilization.
Figure 3. Instructional design and instructional media are two overlapping aspects of instructional technology because while instructional media is defined during design when the delivery system is chosen, it is also important to other domains of instructional technology such as development and utilization.


The Relationship between Instructional Technology and Performance Improvement Technology
Figure 4. The Relationship between Instructional Technology and Performance Improvement Technology


The ADDIE Model
Figure 5. The ADDIE Model
Adopted from Joint Knowledge Development & Distribution Capability (JKDDC): Product Development Workflow Tool

 


Figure 6. Dick and Carey (2005) Instructional Systems Design Model
Figure 6. Dick and Carey (2005) Instructional Systems Design Model
Adopted from Lesson 8 - Instructional Strategy, 2006

 

Figure 7. Kellar’s ARCS Model
Figure 7. Kellar’s ARCS Model
Adopted from Cavanaugh & Cavanaugh, 2006

 


Figure 8. The Information Processing Model
Figure 8. The Information Processing Model
Adopted from Huitt, 2003

 


Figure 9. Lantern Slides
Figure 9. Lantern Slides
Adopted from deLuikerwaal, 2006

 

Figure 10. Adopter Categories Continuum
Figure 10. Adopter Categories Continuum
Adopted from South Tees Hospital Improvement Alliance, 2003

Figure 11. The Innovation Adoption Curve
Figure 11. The Innovation Adoption Curve
Adopted from Chen, 2006.


Figure 12. The Instructional Design Project Life-Cycle

Figure 12. The Instructional Design Project Life-Cycle
Adopted from Murdock, 2005


Figure 13. Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Model
Figure 13. Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Model
Adopted from Winfrey, 1999

 

Figure 14. ROI Model

Figure 14. ROI Model
Adopted from Odellion Research, 2006

Printer Friendly Version

Introduction
About Me
Field of IT
Domains
Competencies
Artifacts
Professional
UNCW
MIT Program

Site designed and developed by Amanda Hodges
©2006