MIT
500 Instructional System Design
Context
The work for this self-instructional module was completed during the
Fall Semester of 2003, as the major project in MIT 500.
The first part of the class explored a full range of theories,
approaches and methods of instruction such as cognitivism, constructivism,
problem-based learning, goal-based scenarios, and cognitive
apprenticeship, and the research background related to each approach.
The second part of the class focused on the micro-level
instructional design process and procedures.
The product of this class was a self-instructional module requiring
approximately 45 minutes to complete.
The design, development, and evaluation of this web-based
instructional module was generated using instructional design principles
as the major framework, the Gagne’s Instructional Events and the
conditions of Learning as the module design module.
Conditions
Through informal interviews with staff members, a gap was determined
in what is and what should be at Cape Fear Museum of History and Science,
my place of employment. Staff members are assigned weekend duty on a
rotating basis with one of the primary duties being to operate the
VISTA
software to check in visitors using. The sporadic nature of this duty
meant that a staff member may go months before having to operate the
software and forget the steps. A definite need was established for a
training that could refresh current employees and train new hires.
My content was obtained through the VISTA manual,
VISTA
software, and especially from the full time front desk receptionist.
The instructional module was administered via CD-Rom therefore the
instruction was predominantly web-based however the learners were given a
four-page Instructional Packet with the CD, which included the Pretest,
instructions for getting started with the CD, the Posttest, and an
evaluative questionnaire.
The instruction utilized screenshots of the VISTA software as the main
graphics in the module however several clip art images were used
consistently throughout to indicate specific components of the module.
Scope
The module went from a one-on-one formative evaluation process to a
small group evaluation, and the feedback was relatively minor but
extremely valuable. All of the
participants were actual Museum staff members who had a vested interest in
knowing how to use the software. The
instruction was tweaked, according to the feedback, and new CDs of the
revised instruction were made and distributed to all staff as well as a
newly created job aid. Employees
were enthusiastic about the resource at first but it fell by the wayside
because changes to the software were not updated to the module, and the
training was not sufficiently diffused into the employee culture.
Role
MIT 500 during my enrollment included 4 students so we all conducted
our projects on an individual basis. I
did it all:
- Assessed
Needs to Identify Goals
- Analyze
Learners and Contexts
- Conduct
Instructional Analysis
- Write
Performance Objectives
- Develop
Assessment Instruments
- Develop
Instructional Strategy
- Develop
and Select Instructional Materials
- Design
and Conduct Formative Evaluation
Reflection
Even though I loved learning about learning theory and instructional
theories, and their evolutions, this course was an extraordinary challenge
for me from start to finish, primarily due to my lack of experience as an
instructor. During the
production of my project, I started out confusing the process.
I began designing instruction that went straight to expecting
learners to achieve performance objectives without offering them the
avenue of instruction to that point. The
experience of generating a task analysis, performance objectives, and
assessment instruments is one that I will never forget. It ingrained in me
the discipline and attention to detail that can be carried over to other
areas of my life.
View Module
for
VISTA
Training
|